Tag Archives: Facebook

Internet Epically Trolls Cops on Facebook After They Bragged About Arresting Man for Weed and a Gun

By Matt Agorist (via The Free Thought Project)

In spite of the fact that weed is legal in some form in well over half the country, the drug warrior predator class still viciously enforces the war on marijuana, ruining and ending countless lives from coast to coast in the process.

Showing the massive disconnect between the police and the policed is the fact that despite the majority of the country agreeing on the legalization of marijuana, police departments still shamelessly take to social media to brag about kidnapping, caging and robbing people for it.

The Terrebone Parish Sheriff’s Office in southern Louisiana is the latest department to feel the heat for bragging about a recent kidnapping — and every bit of it is deserved.

On December 1, according to the department, they were patrolling an area near a storage facility and saw a man sitting near his pickup truck. The cops were with the TPSO’s narcotics force and when they pulled up on Brent Meads, they immediately claimed to smell the devil’s lettuce inside his truck.

In their post (archived here) on Facebook, police legitimized Meads’ subsequent kidnapping with the following statement:

Agents learned that Meads did not have a mini storage at this facility.
​After further investigation agents obtained a search warrant for the vehicle and the mini storage. During the execution of the search warrant agents recovered 20 pounds of marijuana, which has a street value of more than $100,000.00, along with $20,000.00 in cash, a Kel-Tec 5.56 rifle and a fully automatic Glock 40. Caliber handgun.

weed

TFTP looked up Meads’ history, and going back years, police in south Louisiana have been arresting him for substances deemed illegal by the state. Likely due to the fact that he cannot get a good job because of his arrest record for drugs, Meads has very few options for employment. So, he apparently resorted to selling cannabis to support himself.

If he lived in California, he’d be heralded as an entrepreneur but because he lives in Louisiana, he is now in jail on a $150,000 bond — for having and allegedly attempting to sell a plant to willing customers.

In Louisiana, medical marijuana is legal with a prescription. The two major companies who hold a monopoly on the distribution of that medical marijuana make millions from that government-maintained monopoly while people like Meads end up in a cage for daring to challenge it.

This is shameful and it must stop and judging from the comments on the TPSO’s post, We The People are ready for a change.

Spike Cohen, the former vice presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party weighed in on the post, saying:

Weed, guns and money should not be illegal, and anyone who would ruin someone’s life over possessing those things needs to examine what it is they do for a living.
Brent Meads did nothing wrong.
When we end the war on drugs, qualified immunity and police unions, you’ll have to stop going after people who are exercising their rights, and start going after your fellow officers when they commit crimes against We the People.

Others agreed pointing out:

“This guy is really just a small business owner. Selling harmless medicine to willing customers for a fair price and owning a firearm in order to protect his business and self. Wheres (sic) the crime?”

The idea that police are still dedicating resources to going after people with a plant when there is a show on Netflix dedicated to cooking with that plant, shows the sheer disconnect between the government and their enforcers in law enforcement and the will of the people. This mentally should have died out a long time ago, yet here we are in 2021, with a mindset in the 30s.

“Dangerous Narcotics?! Get out of here with that nonsense. 1937 called, they want their propaganda back.”

Jasmy Coin’s Recent Gains Might Not Be Sustainable for Long 

BY ANURADHA GARG (via MarketRealist)

On Oct. 9, the JASMY token was added to Coinbase, which boosted awareness of the token and the trading volume. It rose by nearly 57 percent on Oct. 8 and demonstrated the “Coinbase Effect.” The token rose another 56 percent on Oct. 12. The recent steep rise has taken many investors by surprise and they want to know about Jasmy coin’s price prediction.

Generally, cryptocurrencies have been on an uptrend for the past several months. The total cryptocurrency market cap, which fell below $150 billion in March 2020, is now above $2.2 trillion. As the adoption of cryptocurrencies rises, many altcoins have been gaining importance for their real-world uses.

What is Jasmy crypto?

Jasmy provides an IoT (internet of things) platform, which aims to decentralize the process of coordinating networks of data and devices. It does so with the help of storing and computing data on a decentralized storage network, IPFS.

Jasmy claims that it values the concept of data democracy, which means that it aims to return all the personal data files to the hands of the individuals it belongs to. In the new era of information, Jasmy wants to create an environment where data can be exchanged securely as valuables. JASMY is an Ethereum token that powers Jasmy. The coin can also be used to transfer tokens between devices and as payment for network services.

Jasmy price prediction

  • Wallet Investor isn’t positive on Jasmy’s long-term growth trajectory and sees the coin dropping in value by around 87 percent in one year.
  • Priceprediction.net also has a negative view of Jasmy crypto and sees it declining in value by 75 percent on average by the end of 2021.
  • Digital Coin Price sees an upside of more than 50 percent for the coin from the current levels by the end of 2021.

Is Jasmy a good investment?

Like many other IoT crypto networks, Jasmy aims to end the monopoly of giant platformers like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon. While these platforms let users use the service for free, they collect personal data like behavior history. The data is managed, analyzed, and used for various purposes by their centralized systems. In some cases, the data has been leaked due to cyber attacks, system defects, and human mistakes. At times, the data is misused to deliver specific ads or content.

The future for the IoT space as a whole looks bright. According to Mordor Intelligence, the global IoT market is expected to reach $1,386 billion by 2026 from $761.4 billion in 2020. However, this doesn’t mean that the future of all IoT-related projects is good. Some rivals have advantages over Jasmy. IOTA has an early mover advantage in this space with a lot of established partnerships. Until Jasmy proves its worth in a concrete manner, it’s better to give it a pass.

Where to buy Jasmy

Jasmy has been added to Coinbase and investors can purchase it with ease from the platform. Other top exchanges that trade in Jasmy are ZT, Gate.io, Bittrex, Uniswap, and MEXC.

Decentraland Price Prediction: MANA Could Soar To $10 In November 

By Crispus Nyaga (via InvestingCube)

The Decentraland price bullish momentum is continuing as investors cheer the growing metaverse industry. MANA, its native token, is trading at $3.1960, which is about 427% above the lowest level in October. It is a few points below its all-time high of $5, bringing its total market capitalization to more than $5.9 billion. It is the 36th biggest cryptocurrency in the world.

Why did MANA price soar?

Decentraland is a blockchain platform that was built using Ethereum’s technology. It is one of the biggest platforms involved in the so-called metaverse industry. Precisely, the token allows members to develop a virtual universe where they can buy and sell digital assets like real estate. Ownership of this land is changed through non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

The strong rebound of the Decentraland price is mostly because of last week’s announcement by Facebook. In a statement, Mark Zuckeberg announced that the company will be known as Meta. Meta will be the holding company for platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp. The company will also be a leading player in the so-called metaverse industry.

Therefore, the MANA price soared since investors believe that Facebook’s rebrand will introduce more people into its network. 

Decentraland price prediction

On the daily chart, we see that the MANA price rocketed higher during the weekend. This makes it one of the best performing cryptocurrencies this week. However, the bullish trend seems to have found some resistance. It is, indeed, forming a bullish pennant pattern that is usually a bullish sign. The price is also significantly above the 25-day and 50-day moving averages.

Therefore, this breakout is still unfolding. I believe that the bullish trend will continue in October. If this happens, the next key levels to watch will be $5 and then $10. This view will be invalidated if the price falls below the key support at $1.50.

Decentraland Price

Facebook’s Meta rebrand causes obscure crypto MANA to jump 400% 

BY CHRIS MORRIS (via Fortune)

Facebook’s well-publicized (and often mocked) rebranding elevated MANA, a cryptocurrency that most people have never heard of, into the spotlight, resulting in a three-day price spike of 462% over the weekend.

The crypto has since lost some ground and is currently trading at $3.13, according to Coinbase. That’s still a 306% increase over Oct. 27, the day before Facebook announced its rebranding.

MANA is the token for Decentraland, which describes itself as a metaverse platform that allows users to buy and sell virtual properties. The token runs on the Ethereum blockchain.

Decentraland itself provides a gamelike atmosphere in which people create virtual lands and others explore them and participate in social games. Visually, it’s not unlike Roblox or Second Life.

Using MANA, visitors can buy “property” or upgrade it to whatever environment they want. They can also buy and sell items to use in the virtual world, as well as list their properties for sale. (Prices range from 30,000 MANA to over 1 million.)

Facebook’s big bet on the metaverse has ignited interest in many companies that focus on that space. Decentraland operates a bit differently than Facebook is expected to in the virtual world, though, focusing on user-generated content that lets people make money for themselves, rather than walled gardens that could enrich corporations.

MANA’s not the only crypto to see a surge after Facebook changed its name. SAND, the token for Sandbox, another virtual world, jumped from 74¢ on Oct. 27 to more than $2 on Monday, a 176% increase. (At its peak this weekend, SAND was trading at $2.35, a 218% increase.)

Facebook Rebrand Fuels Metaverse Token Run With Decentraland (MANA) Leading Pack 

By Robert D Knight (Via beincrypto)

IN BRIEF

  • Facebook is rebranding to Meta as it shifts focus to the metaverse.
  • The news has proved bullish for existing crypto metaverse projects.
  • The social media giant has pre-existing crypto interests thanks to Diem.

Metaverse tokens have pumped in the last 24 hours following the announcement that Facebook will rebrand to Meta, as the company shifts its long-term focus from social media and messaging, to immersive 3D virtual environments.

At time of press Decentraland (MANA) is up 54.8%, Axie Infinity(AXS) is up 15.5%, The Sandbox (SAND) is up 23%, and Dentral Games (DG) has recorded gains of 13.8%.

Mark Zuckerberg confirmed the change in focus during his Connect 2021 keynote presentation, delivered on October 28th. Appearing initially from the real world, Zuckerberg then bathed in an otherworldly blue light before being transported to a simulated virtual reality.

“Over time, I hope that we are seen as a metaverse company and I want to anchor our work and our identity on what we’re building towards,” he said. “It is time for us to adopt a new company brand to encompass everything that we do, to reflect who we are and what we hope to build.”

A suite of new features will be rolled out by Meta over the course of the coming year, incorporating Facebook and Instagram into metaverse work environments as well as offering multiple user accounts, allowing users to keep their personal and work lives separate.

While the metaverse is already big news in the cryptosphere, Facebook’s branding change naturally brings greater exposure within the sector and beyond.

Facebook, Meta and Diem

The recent Facebook rebrand is not the first time Zuckerberg has aligned company interests with crypto-related technologies. In 2019 the Facebook CEO set the crypto world into a frenzy when he announced the launch of a new cryptocurrency dubbed Libra.

The plan drew Congressional scrutiny and has since languished in development hell, losing key founding members of its board, paired back its ambitions, and rebranded as Diem.

Zuckerberg and Meta will undoubtedly hope that their next brush with the cryptosphere is less fraught with difficulty.

Court Hears CHD’s Arguments Against Facebook, Zuckerberg and ‘Fact Checkers’

Lawyers for Children’s Health Defense await the ruling of Judge Susan Illston after defending CHD’s lawsuit alleging government-sponsored censorship, false disparagement and wire fraud.

By Children’s Health Defense

Judge Susan Illston of the Northern District of California Wednesday heard arguments for and against the defendants’ motion to dismiss in the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) lawsuit, which claims that Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg and three fact-checking operations censor truthful public health posts and engage in racketeering activities against CHD. 

According to CHD’s complaint, Facebook has insidious conflicts with the pharmaceutical industry and its captive health agencies, and has economic stakes in vaccines, telecom and 5G.

Facebook currently censors CHD’s page, targeting factual information about vaccines, 5G and public health agencies. Facebook-owned Instagram deplatformed CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on Feb. 10 without notice or explanation.

This is an important First Amendment case that tests the boundaries of government authority to openly censor unwanted critique of its narrative, attorneys Roger Teich and Jed Rubenfeld argued before the court. Attorneys Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Mary Holland, CHD president, also are lawyers on the legal briefs.

CHD is a nonprofit watchdog group that roots out corruption in federal agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and exposes wrongdoings in the pharmaceutical and telecom industries.

CHD has been a frequent critic of WiFi and 5G Network safety and of certain vaccine policies that place profits ahead of public health. CHD has fiercely criticized agency corruption at the WHO, CDC and FCC.

Facebook has publicly stated it is assisting efforts of the White House, the CDC and the WHO to censor unwanted speech about vaccines. While earlier court decisions have upheld Facebook’s right to censor user pages, CHD argues that the social media giant’s open collaboration with government makes it a proxy for government censorship, violating the First Amendment.

The government’s role in Facebook’s censorship goes deeper than its close coordination with the CDC and WHO — it began at the suggestion of powerful Democratic Congressman and Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who in March 2019, asked Facebook to suppress and purge internet content critical of government vaccine policies.

Facebook, Schiff and many other government officials use the term “misinformation” as a euphemism for any statement, whether truthful or not, that contradicts official government pronouncements.

The WHO issued a press release commending Facebook for coordinating its ongoing censorship campaign with public health officials. That same day, Facebook published a “warning label” on CHD’s page, implying that CHD’s content is inaccurate and directing CHD followers to turn to the CDC for “reliable, up-to-date information.”

CHD’s lawsuit also challenges Facebook use of so-called “independent fact-checkers,” which, in truth, are neither independent nor fact-based, to create oppositional content on CHD’s page, superimposed over CHD’s original content, about matters of heated scientific controversy.

To further silence CHD’s dissent against government policies and the pharmaceutical industry, Facebook deactivated CHD’s donate button and uses a variety of deceptive technologies, including shadow banning, to minimize CHD’s reach and visibility.

In short, the lawsuit contends Facebook and the government collude to silence CHD and its followers. Such tactics violate the First Amendment, which guarantees the American public the free flow of information in the marketplace of ideas.

The First Amendment forbids the government from censoring private speech — particularly speech that criticizes government policies or officials. As Justice Holmes famously said, “The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.”

The ongoing COVID crisis makes the need for open and fierce public debate on health issues in our democracy more critical than ever.

Mark Zuckerberg publicly claims social media platforms shouldn’t be “the arbiters of truth.” Yet his acts to suppress critique of government officials and policies belie those pronouncements.

The court will decide whether Facebook’s new government-directed business model of false and misleading “warning labels,” deceptive “fact-checks” and disabling a nonprofit’s donate button passes muster under the First and Fifth Amendments, the Lanham Act and the federal racketeering statute. Those statutes protect CHD against online wire fraud and knowingly false statements disparaging to the organization, while the Constitution protects CHD against government censorship — even through third parties — and from uncompensated taking of its property interests.

“Mainstream media and social media giants are imposing a totalitarian censorship to prevent public health advocates, like myself, from voicing concerns and from engaging in civil informed debate in the public square,” said Kennedy.

Kennedy added:

“They are punishing, shaming, vilifying, gaslighting and abolishing individuals who report their own vaccine injuries. Anyone can see that this is a formula for catastrophe and a coup d’état against the First Amendment, the foundation stone of American democracy.”

CHD awaits Judge Illston’s ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Facebook’s Zuckerberg donated hundreds of millions to help Democrats steal the election for Joe Biden

By JD Heyes (via Natural News)

When it overtook its social media rival, MySpace, even then few could have predicted that Facebook would grow into the big tech behemoth that it is today.

Moreover, who would have thought that a geeky billionaire named Mark Zuckerberg would become powerful enough to literally decide the outcome of presidential elections?

And yet, that’s what he did last fall.

Zuckerberg donated more than $400 million in “election grants” to counties mostly in key battleground states where D.C. establishment lawyers, PACs, lobbyists and operatives from both sides of the aisle stole Donald Trump’s shoo-in reelection.

Trump was sure to have some difficulties, we believed, because Democratic mayors and governors helped destroy his massively successful economy and blamed a Chinese-borne virus on him. But given the massive outpouring of support everywhere the former president went — and places he didn’t go that still saw massive Trump vehicle and boat parades — his reelection looked certain.

Biden, by comparison, along with his VP pick Kamala Harris, couldn’t draw flies to a BS contest. Virtually no one came out to see them at the limited rallies they did. Harris was so unimpressive to Democratic voters she was one of the first to drop out of the crowded Democratic presidential field. And Biden stayed in his basement for much of the campaign, limiting his exposure to gaffes, forgetful moments and times when he clearly couldn’t think straight or enunciate clearly.

So Zuckerberg stepped up and helped fund the effort to take away Trump’s sure-fire reelection victory by pouring hundreds of millions into the effort, and nowhere was his election interference more prevalent than in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.

Broad and Liberty reported:

Grant monies awarded to help fund the 2020 election in at least 21 different Pennsylvania counties were heavily skewed toward counties with high Democratic registration and recent voting turnout, an analysis from Broad + Liberty shows.

Pennsylvania Republicans are currently considering legislation that would change the rules for private grants such as these in future elections, requiring them to go directly to the Pa. Department of State to be distributed evenly. Similar bills have been passed in Georgia and Arizona and are being considered in other states. 

The money was funneled through the nonprofit Center for Tech and Civic Life, which was founded in 2015. The org drew a lot of attention in the lead-up to the 2020 election when Zuckerberg and his wife Pricilla Chan gave it $250 million. A month later, the power tech couple added another $100 million; about $22 million of that money found its way to 21 Pennsylvania counties.

Republicans in the state smelled a rat right off the bat. They saw what was happening: The Zuckerberg-funded nonprofit was purchasing election infrastructure that would be used to drive Democratic voter turnout in a state nearly all political observers agreed would be vital to put in the Electoral College “win” column.

State GOP Rep. Jim Struzzi, who is a sponsor of the new legislation, noted that the actions undertaken by the CTCL are likely a violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protections clause because “all eligible voters must be given equal access to their right to vote.” He said giving some counties grants while denying it to others is inherently unfair.

Democrats and at least one state judge disagreed, pointing to a CTCL grant to some counties that went for Trump by a 2-to-1 margin. But that is window dressing to make the grants look ‘bipartisan’ when far more money went to Democrat-heavy jurisdictions.

“We must put a stop to private money election grants to cities and counties,” said state Republican Rep. Eric Nelson. “Big tech significantly outspent government in selective areas resulting in a dangerous precedent for all future elections. I fought this before the election and will continue to battle tactics that result in the unequal treatment of voters.”

How about adding this: Zuckerberg should be arrested for election meddling.

Democrat senators wage war on “anti-vaxxers” with shocking HIT LIST of targeted truth-tellers

By Ethan Huff (via Natural News)

Senators Amy “Karen” Klobuchar (D-MN) and Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) have launched a crusade against Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and numerous other big-name medical professionals for supposedly spreading “disinformation” about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) online.

The Democrat duo sent a letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey urging them to delete these and nine other “anti-vaccine” accounts from social media because they threaten the Big Pharma cash cow and eugenics agenda.

“We write to express our concern about the public health ramifications of online coronavirus vaccine disinformation and to urge you to remove the accounts that have been identified by experts as responsible for producing the majority of this disinformation on social media platforms,” Klobuchar and Luján wrote.

“A recent report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) identified a dozen specific content producers as the original sources of an estimated 65 percent of coronavirus disinformation online,” they added.

Klobuchar and Luján say they are especially worried about such messaging being targeted at black and Latino communities, as these folks are prime targets for the deep state’s depopulation agenda.

“For too long, social media platforms have failed to adequately protect Americans by not taking sufficient action to prevent the spread of vaccine disinformation online,” Klobuchar and Luján further contend.

“Despite your policies intended to prevent vaccine disinformation, many of these accounts continue to post content that reach millions of users, repeatedly violating your policies with impunity.”

Leftists can’t win the information war on merit or credibility so they are cheating with tyranny and censorship

Along with Tenpenny, Mercola, and Kennedy, the Democrat duo also names Ty and Charlene Bollinger, Rizza Islam, Rashid Buttar, Erin Elizabeth, Sayer Ji, Kelly Brogan, Christiane Northrup, Ben Tapper, and Kevin Jenkins as problematic influencers who are convincing too many people to skip the jab and take off the mask.

It is apparently not okay that Tenpenny, for instance, told her followers about a scientific study that determined cloth masks to be both dangerous and ineffective at preventing the spread of the Chinese Virus. Because Klobuchar and Luján do not approve of this type of science, they want Zuckerberg to ban it.

Likewise, the other aforementioned names have posted similar content informing people that getting out in the sun more and eating healthy can greatly reduce the risk of contracting any type of infection. Klobuchar and Luján do not want people to know about any of this, so they are demanding that it be pulled from the internet.

As we recently reported, the Biden regime is spending billions of your tax dollars trying to get social media influencers to push vaccines and masks, which is apparently not working as tens of millions of Americans are resisting.

It is abundantly clear that the deep state is in a panic over the fact that more Americans than perhaps ever before are breaking through the spell and ignoring the government’s “public health” guidelines. Because of this, wannabe dictator political puppets like Klobuchar and Luján are desperately trying to stop the flow of truth through tyranny.

“Vaccine disinformation? What they mean is they want everyone canceled who questions them, proves them wrong, or spreads the light on the danger of vaccines,” wrote an Infowars commenter about this latest shenanigan. “They want as many people as possible kept in the dark and unable to see the truth.”

“This is what you would have thought the communist Chinese government would be involved in – nope, it is here in America now.”

More of the latest news about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) tyranny can be found at Pandemic.news.

As Apple, Google, Amazon Ban Parler, Twitter Allegedly Profited by Refusing to Remove Child Porn

By Matt Agorist (via Free Thought Project)

As TFTP reported earlier this month, Parler has been a haven for those who have been banned, deleted, or otherwise algorithmed into the memory hole by establishment media platforms. Users moved to Parler because the platform claimed not to censor their content and it was safe space for MAGA folks. For over a year, Parler has remained an open network where pro-Trump users largely proceeded uncensored. Until now. Though the Parler url is still active, it is no longer a functioning social media site.

In the middle of the night on January 11, Amazon took down Parler from its web-hosting service. Amazon Web Services, or AWS said Parler had violated its terms of service given its inadequate content-moderation practices for failing to remove posts glorifying the recent riot at the U.S. Capitol. Google and Apple joined in as well, ensuring that Parler is deplatformed indefinitely.

This move came on the heels of a massive purge of tens of thousands of pro-Trump folks who allegedly espoused ridiculous Qanon theories. It was bad enough that these folks were duped into following the psyop known as Q. Now, however, instead of realizing the absurdity of these ideas as they are debunked in the public arena, that is no longer an option. Now, they will grasp onto these whacky ideas as the massive monopolistic power of tech behemoths imposing their neoliberal will on them gives them justification for doing so.

In the meantime, however, the social media giants Twitter and Facebook remain unfazed as they keep their insidious relationships with the US government thriving. While banning Trump for his speech during the riots at the capitol, Twitter is alleged in a lawsuit to have victimized a child by knowingly allowing a video of him to go viral.

The boy and his mother are now suing the platform alleging that it benefitted financially by failing to remove the video featuring the child and another minor — which was retweeted thousands of times and garnered nearly 200,000 views.

To be clear, this was not a mistake that simply didn’t pick up on the nature of the content. The boy and his mother, according to the lawsuit, repeatedly contacted Twitter about the content, but the social media giant allegedly didn’t suspend accounts distributing it until a federal agent from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intervened.

In fact, according to the lawsuit, Twitter even responded to the boy and his mother via email and said the child porn did not violate its policies. According to the suit, an email shows Twitter telling John Doe on Jan. 28, 2020, that it “reviewed the content, and didn’t find a violation of our policies, so no action will be taken at this time.”

“What do you mean you don’t see a problem?” the minor asks in a response that same day. “We both are minors right now and were minors at the time these videos were taken. We both were 13 years of age.”

A subsequent screen shot shows that the video accumulated 167,000 views within a day and received more than 2,200 retweets and 6,640 likes.

The video made its way to Twitter after the boy was tricked into sharing the content with a fake account on Snapchat. The account belonged to child traffickers posing as a 16-year-old girl and they blackmailed the boy into sending in the video.

“Plaintiff John Doe was solicited and recruited for sex trafficking as a minor,” reads the lawsuit brought in part by the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE). “After John Doe escaped from the manipulation, child sexual abuse material depicting John Doe was disseminated on Twitter. When Twitter was first alerted to this fact and John Doe’s age, Twitter refused to remove the illegal material and instead continued to promote and profit from the sexual abuse of this child.” 

Twitter has not confirmed any details about the incident. But the attorney representing the family says the video going viral — despite the heavy-handed censorship on the platform — shows that they are more concerned with censoring political speech than protecting children.

“We found it very interesting that Twitter, over the last few months, has really shown the world what kind of policing of their platform they are capable of, what the technology is they have at their fingertips, and what they are able to do,” Lisa Haba, partner at the Haba Law Firm, told Fox News in an interview.

She then added that “you would think that amongst everything they are able to police that there would be a premium priority on the protection of children. They literally have policies stating that they’ll do that but their practices say another word.”

As FOX reported, John Doe is seeking damages under the federal Trafficking Victims’ Protection Reauthorization Act, and claiming the platform was a significant cause of his distress. As the suit noted, recent legislation has clarified that Section 230 doesn’t apply to platforms that knowingly facilitate sex trafficking.

For years, TFTP has reported on this phenomenon of Facebook attacking political speech while child exploitation goes unchecked. In 2018, Facebook and Twitter — without warning or justification — deleted the pages of Free Thought Project and Police the Police which had over 5 million followers.

During this purge, they also removed hundreds of other pages including massive police accountability groups, antiwar activists, alternative media, and libertarian news outlets. Facebook claimed to remove these pages in the name of fighting disinformation online and creating a safer user experience. But this was a farce. Illustrating just how big of an ostentatious sham this was, just weeks after claiming to keep their community safe, a child was openly sold on their platform.

An auction was held on Facebook in which a child bride was put up for sale in a public post. People openly bid on Facebook for a 16-year-old girl’s hand in marriage.

Facebook claims they removed the post, but this wasn’t until weeks after the auction had ended and the girl had been sold. Had the post had something about Qanon on it, however, rest assured, it would have been removed immediately.

This was no isolated incident either. The Guardian reported a study in 2020 that suggested Facebook is not fully enforcing its own standards banning content that exploits or endangers children.

According to the study, it examined at least 366 cases between January 2013 and December 2019, according to a report from the not-for-profit investigative group Tech Transparency Project (TPP) analyzing Department of Justice news releases.

Of the 366 cases of child sex abuse on Facebook, the social media giant reported just 9% of them to authorities. Investigations initiated by authorities discovered the other 91% of the cases — not Facebook.

It’s not just Facebook either. Twitter is in the same boat. In 2020, TFTP reported on Twitter allowing the promotion of child molestation on their platform.

Since we reported on the rebranding of pedophiles as Minor Attracted Persons several years ago, the terminology became so popular that it morphed into multiple categories and abbreviations. There are now NOMAPS, which apparently are the “best kind” of MAP because the “NO” means they don’t want to have sex with children. That’s where the pro-c MAPs come in. The “pro-c” denotes pro-contact as in the belief that children can consent into having physical contact and sex with an adult. Children cannot consent to sex with an adult.

Though our report led to the deletion of multiple accounts who openly advocated for sex with children, these pro-pedophile tags on Twitter still openly trend to promote this content.

The platforms that swiftly moved in and banned pro-peace, anti-racist, pro-liberty, and antiwar speech have no problem allowing #mappositivity #mappositivity2 #mappositivity3 #mappride #mapcommunity#mapcommunity2 #mapally #promap #zoophile #zoopride #zoopositivity #zoosexual.

If you still think that big tech censorship is in your best interests, you need to read this article.

ZUCKERBERG FORCES INSTAGRAM USERS TO FOLLOW JOE BIDEN ACCOUNT

article – https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/instagram-forcing-users-follow-biden-white-house-account-not-pathetic-even-users-repeatedly-un-follow-page/
Odysee Channel: https://odysee.com/@SaltyCracker:a
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/SaltyCracker
Website: https://saltycrackermerch.com/
Merchandise: https://saltycrackermerch.com/salty-merch/
PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/ycmmuc9z
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SaltyCracker9
SubscribeStar: https://tinyurl.com/tcolt9z
DLive: https://dlive.tv/TheSaltyCracker
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/TheSaltyCracker/ 
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/s7sIruG9mgWl/

–Disclaimer–
These are the opinions and ramblings of a lunatic. They are for entertainment purposes only and are probably wrong. You listen at your own risk.