Tag Archives: Politics

The WEF’s Great Reset – Euphemism for a WWIII Scenario?

By Peter Koenig (via Global Research)

Let’s make no mistake, we are already in WWIII. A more noble term is “The Great Reset” – the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) eloquent description of a devastated worldwide economy, countless bankruptcies and unemployment, abject misery, famine, death by starvation, disease and suicide. Hundreds of millions of people have already been affected by this “collateral” damage of the “covid-19” fear-propaganda bio-war, with a death-toll maybe already in the tens of millions, but which in reality cannot even be assessed at this time.

And this only one year into this criminal madness, a diabolical elite of multi-multi billionaires has pushed upon us, We the People. We are only in the first year of the war which by the Reset’s plan is to last the entire decade 2020-2030. The agenda is supposed to be completed by 2030 – it’s also called UN Agenda 2030.

See this.

The WEF is, in fact, nothing more than an NGO, registered in a lush suburb of Geneva, Switzerland. Its members are, however, a collection of dirty-rich people: High-ranking politicians, heads of corporations, banking gnomes, artists and Hollywood personalities – none of them are people’s elected officials with a mandate to rule the world.

Yet, they are effectively ruling the world, by coopting, coercing, or threatening the entire UN system and its 193 member countries into their obedience. Because they think they have all the money in the world, and they can. Mind you, money acquired in a fraudulent system designed by them. – But more importantly, because We, the People, let them.

The Great Reset has three major goals, all of equal importance

(i) massive depopulation,

(ii) shifting all assets from the bottom and the middle to the top; following the motto for the masses, at the end “You will own nothing and be happy”. That is Klaus Schwab’s conclusion for the completion of The Great Reset; and

(iii) a complete digitized control over everything – money, mind, personal records and behaviors – a combination of Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World”, and George Orwell’s “1984”. See this.

As we can see, the WEF is involved at every level in the Plandemic and its consequences, especially the consequences that favor the Great Reset. As Klaus Schwab in the Great Reset so revealingly says, the pandemic opens a “small window of opportunity” during which these consequences (meaning the reshaping of the world) have to be realized. Everything has to work like clockwork.

So far, it seems to be on track. Though, as more people are waking up and scientists consciousness make them leaving their straight-jacketed matrix-jobs, resistance is growing exponentially.

The NGO, trillion-dollar members-powerhouse, WEF, is outranking the world’s peoples designed and implemented UN system by far. Recently the WEF, now in association with Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was warning of a cyber-attack on the western monetary system. To emphasize their point, they said, it is “Not a Question of If but When.

According to the Last American Vagabond (LAV), a “report published last year by the WEF-Carnegie Cyber Policy Initiative, calls for the merging of Wall Street banks, their regulators and intelligence agencies as necessary to confront an allegedly imminent cyber-attack that will collapse the existing financial system.”

The LAV article goes on saying

“In 2019, the same year as Event 201 took place (Event 201 – 18 October 2019, in NYC, simulating the current SARS-CoV-2 plandemic and destruction of the world economy), the Endowment launched its Cyber Policy Initiative with the goal of producing an “International Strategy for Cybersecurity and the Global Financial System 2021-2024.” That strategy was released just months ago, in November 2020 and, according to the Endowment, was authored by “leading experts in governments, central banks, industry and the technical community” in order to provide a “longer-term international cybersecurity strategy”, specifically for the financial system.”

The Cyber Policy Initiative emanating from the joint venture’s WEF- Carnegie Endowment report of  November 2020, is contained in a paper titled

International Strategy to Better Protect the Financial System.

It begins by noting that the global financial system, like many other systems, are “going through unprecedented digital transformation, which is being accelerated by the coronavirus pandemic.” It concludes with the warning that:

“Malicious actors are taking advantage of this digital transformation and pose a growing threat to the global financial system, financial stability, and confidence in the integrity of the financial system. Malign actors are using cyber capabilities to steal from, disrupt, or otherwise threaten financial institutions, investors and the public. These actors include not only increasingly daring criminals, but also states and state-sponsored attackers.”

A fully digitized monetary system has been on the WEF’s and IMF’s agenda for years. They cannot wait to implement it. So, if indeed, a cyber-attack on the western monetary system actually will take place, there is no question, who has planned and implemented it.

The drive for total digitization of everything, but foremost the (western) world’s monetary system, is an integral part of The Great Reset. It is supported, of course, by the banking and finance sector, including western central banks. Its implementation is to be accelerated by the covid-fraud, but encounters fierce resistance in many countries, especially in the Global South but also in the western industrialized countries, where intellectual groups realize what this means for the resources and assets worked for and owned by the people – it will be easily ‘expropriated’ so to speak, for example, for disobedience, as the control will be fully with the banks.

And this leads to the conclusion of the nefarious Great Reset – “You will own nothing and be happy”.

Luckily, the East, led by China and Russia, has gradually withdrawn from the western monetary system and are largely independent, monetary-sovereign countries. Therefore the western digitization drive does not apply to the East which is further enhanced by the China-Russia led Shanghai Cooperation Organization – SCO – accounting for about half the world’s population and a third of the world’s economic output – GDP.

See here for the full LAV article.

If Klaus Schwab and the WEF’s “Illuminati” would have their way, by 2030 the grand flock of humans will be transformed into “transhumans” – a kind of semi-robots that responds to AI signals controlled by The Great Reset’s masterminds (sic), which by then will have become the leaders of a tyranny, called the New or One World Order – OWO.

We, the People, would then have become the new AI-directed serfs. Or, as per Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the “epsilon people”.

Let that not happen.

Let’s unite and resist with all our powers.

We are still 7.8 billion people against a few pathological soulless multi-billionaires.

Edmond Rothschild: “Who runs your government”? “Who is Madame president that is in congress right this second, running it”?

Click the image to link to Facebook Profile

In this Live Feed dated 27th April at approx 2am Baron goes on to question what work elected officials in the US actually do? Which in all fairness, what is it they actually do? He goes on to say:

I’d dearly like to know the answer to this question. Who runs your government? You vote for a president, right? Your president is supposed to be the president of congress, that’s supposed to be the person that runs it. How many times have you seen your president in congress, working? How many times have you seen your president In congress working? You have voted for your president, either Donald trump, or you voted for Joe Biden, to be president of congress. Imma say this one more time. You voted for a president to run congress… how many times have you seen your president in congress performing their jobs? Can you please answer this question? Other than giving a speech, other than giving a speech or the union address. Tell me how many times you have seen your president inside of congress signing laws or settling debates between the democrats and republicans. Can you please tell me how many times you have seen your president? You’re right, you have never seen em, you have never seen your president in congress. In the time that you’ve been alive, you have never seen your president in congress. Nope. Not once. Not one time have you seen em in there other than to give a speech. Not to go over the laws. Not to go over the mandates. Not to go over what’s on the books. Not to go what’s over on the business projects, or what’s going on inside the government. Not going over the books on the union hall, and union hall representatives. Not to go over top the businesses or projects being developed or engineered or constructed with inside of the government, that has to have the contracts in order to do the job necessary. So again, when was the last time you seen your president in congress performing his job? Never. You have never seen your president, of the United States, or for that matter, 90% of the presidents in the world. In. the. world! How many of them presidents have you seen sit down with their congress, and discuss jobs? Discuss projects with their union, with their workforce? Can anybody please answer me this question? You don’t. Not one of them. When something comes up, when it is delegated, to the House of Representatives and to congress. Not as a representative of you, but as a representative of me? So when you click on your little thing real quick, go look at Madame president that sits in congress right now, she’s not their on your behalf, she’s there on the federal reserves behalf, of 4.5 million businesses. Again, you don’t even know how the fuck your country runs. Well I might just come on up there and run it for you, because apparently that’s what the fuck needs to be done. Because you ain’t got no back bone, you ain’t got no balls to kick anybody out of the country. You don’t have any balls to run a fucking country completely or correctly. You don’t know how to perform your job because you don’t know how to be delegated, because you’ve never been delegated, you’ve never had anybody stand up for you, you’ve never had nobody on your side, you’ve never had shit! What have you had? You’ve had contracts. You had bills written out. That’s what you’ve had. You want somebody to speak up for you the people? You want things to be ran as a kingdom for you? You want you to be taken care of as far as your assets, as far as your jobs, as far as your unions, as far as the United States economy… then you ask me. Cause they’re my businesses, that I have 97% of all assets. So if you’d like to know again how this world works, you just come right on over here and I’ll be more than happy to tell you, because apparently nobody knows how to do their…

Baron Edmond De Rothschild – Facebook

In this Live Feed dated 27th April at approx 1am Baron goes on to talk about who is in control in the United States. I’ve done my best to compile a transcript:

“I’m gonna leave a link above, but I know for a fact, when you voted, you voted for who is going to run congress. Who is going to be the president of congress. So you got to vote for president Joe Biden, or you got to vote for president Donald Trump. Who is Madame president that is in congress right this second, running it? That’s making decisions and laws which inside of the government that has no authority inside or on that chair. I like to know this question. Can anybody answer this question? Because you elected an official to perform a job. That is to be the head of congress. Nowwww, again if you voted for Donald trump and supposedly the election got stolen, by Joe Biden, who is Madame president sitting in congress in the position of Joe Biden? Because she’s not an elected official. In other words, your country has still been taken over, and they’re still playing a masquerade game with you, have you not understood this yet people? Your country was taken over, and they’re masquerading a game, but yet you’re not gonna do nothing about it. It’s sad. Sad. Sad. Sad. Sad. See this is why I won’t give the United States any money.

Baron Edmond De Rothschild – Facebook

Dr. Fauci admits COVID vaccine may not be safe

Via Natural News

In an interview on Meet The Press, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has hyped the Coronavirus vaccine since day one, just admitted the COVID vaccines he hyped as a way to save lives may not actually be safe. In a live interview with Chuck Todd, the New York Post reports that the epidemiologist blatantly stated that the country needed to “make sure” the vaccine truly is safe before we give it to children and maybe pregnant women, whom Fauci said are generally “vulnerable” to vaccines.

The New York Post cites him as saying:

The reason is traditionally when you have a situation like a new vaccine, you want to make sure, because children as well as pregnant women, are vulnerable, so, before you put it into the children, you’re going to want to make sure you have a degree of efficacy and safety that is established in an adult population, particularly an adult, normal population.

It is for this reason the new vaccine is going to be tested on “hundreds to a couple of thousands” of children, the New York Post reports him saying.

So, in short, we don’t know if this vaccine is safe, but we’re going to pump it into children anyways.

But what is particularly striking about his statements are when he said we needed to be certain of the vaccine’s safety in a “normal” population. For those of you who are scientifically-minded or work in the field of vaccine testing or statistics, you likely know this means a population that represents the general public.

It is worth knowing that no vaccine ever had a “normal” population in any of the tests. Moderna’s own trials tell us this:

In the safety analysis of the Phase 3 clinical trial, at the time of vaccination, the mean age of the trial population was 52 years (range 18?95); 22,831 (75.2%) of participants were 18 to 64 years of age and 7,520 (24.8%) of participants were 65 years of age and older.

Overall, 52.7% of trial participants were male, and 47.3% were female.

Among trial participants in the safety analysis, 20.5% were Hispanic or Latino, 79.2% were White, 10.2% were African American, 4.6% were Asian, 0.8% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 0.2% were Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 2.1% were Other, and 2.1% were Multiracial.

The demographics of the U.S. are ACTUALLY as follows: 50.8% are women, 49.2% are male, 55% are between 18 and 64 years of age, 16.5% are 65 and older, 18.5% are Hispanic or Latino, 76.3% are White, 13.4% are African American, 5.4% are Asian, 1.3% are American Indian or Alaska Native, 2.8% are multiracial.

So, old people were drastically over-represented, and African Americans, Asians, and women were underrepresented. Additionally, Hispanics and Latinos were over-represented, while white people were also over-represented. This is hardly a “normal” population.

However, we don’t even know the preexisting conditions of the sample group and whether that also followed the “normal” population. Moderna doesn’t tell us any of this. But not even factoring in the health of the participants, just based on this one sample size we can already see, it becomes clear this test group doesn’t align with a “normal” population.

According to Dr. Fauci’s recent statements, you only know a vaccine is safe when it hits a “normal” population. So, if we take his statements at face value, there’s no way anyone could have said this vaccine was safe because the trials didn’t consist of a normal population.

Further, in Pfizer’s test, they blatantly state it was only performed on “healthy individuals.” We already know from their own study report on page 41 of the PDF that they did not include people with certain STDs. Additionally, they outline the criteria for being barred from the test on page 145 of the report. But, you know, these “healthy people” somehow are representative of the “normal” public and the FDA approved this vaccine for emergency use despite these shortcomings in the trial.

So yeah, we knew this vaccine was potentially unsafe, and we know it’s also potentially unsafe for children and maybe even pregnant women, but the government still authorized it on the general public and now they’re trying to authorize it on children. But it doesn’t even end there. . .

Dr. Fauci also stated in a White House briefing, according to the New York Post:

If you can show that it’s safe and that in fact it induces the kind of response that is reflective of the protection — mainly the correlate of immunity — what you can do is bridge that to the efficacy data that you got from the 30,000[-person] trial with Moderna and the 44,000[-person] trial that we did with Pfizer.

“If you can show that it’s safe.” I thought is was safe, Dr. Fauci. I thought the vaccine was safe and effective and that anyone who disagreed was a “conspiracy theorist.” The fact of the matter is, you probably don’t know if it’s safe for children, just like you probably didn’t know if it was safe for adults. That’s likely why the FDA never actually approved the vaccine but only approve its emergency use and why you said we need to test it on a “normal” population to see if it’s safe or not.

Read more at: TheWashingtonGazette.com and Vaccines.news.